UK Karting - Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting) : @Gem

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)

@Gem
Posted by 'DavyBoy' on 19 Aug 2009 @ 21:06

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

DavyBoyJoined: July 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

You've unloaded a heavy rant there with very little of substance. You appear to be in denial that the TKM classes are collapsing around the country, albeit possibly not where you're racing, and you're advocating a do nothing approach.

A few points.

o How many new chassis will be listed for TKM homologation next time round ? An educated guess ? Maybe none ? That's an indication that the karting trade have abandoned the class because they can't make any money from it... and that's also the reason why Tal-ko are considering opening up the regs to allow CIK chassis.

o I was the one who suggested allowing novices to race without taking an ARKS test. Before the introduction of ARKS tests, all drivers started out as novices in their first race. Believe it or not, driving standards were actually better than they are today. And before you continue this hysteria of 'non-ARKS' drivers, Club100, possibly the most successful arrive and drive organization in the country, do not require an MSA licence for you to compete... and guess what... they don't have any problems with that either.
By lowering the barrier to entry, you will reduce the cost and make joining the TKM /2 a lot simpler than other karting formulae.

Message Thread:

2010TKM Rules by 'Darlo' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:22)

Re: 2010TKM Rules by 'MattScott' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:35)

just another money making scheme ? by 'winger93' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:40)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'deangwigan' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:48)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'stemorton46' (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'stemorton46' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:02)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'deangwigan' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:11)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'stemorton46' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:16)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'NickyW' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:12)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'Graham S' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:17)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'stemorton46' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:19)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'John' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:27)

Re: just another money making scheme ? by 'deangwigan' (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:34)

eh? :s (nt) by 'blobslosak' (18 Aug 2009 @ 17:17)

Re: eh? :s (nt) by 'Darlo' (18 Aug 2009 @ 22:27)

Rotax dead at club level ? by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:59)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:13)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'KMS' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:26)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:33)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:57)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:10)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'John' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)

Re: Rotax dead at club level ? by 'richardmcculloch69' (21 Aug 2009 @ 21:21)

TKM needs to be opened up by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:04)

100cc is allowed by 'MattScott' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:10)

Re: 100cc is allowed by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:30)

Re: 100cc is allowed by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)

Re: 100cc is allowed by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:53)

Re: 100cc is allowed by 'Darlo' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:56)

Re: 100cc is allowed by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:04)

I agree Dean by 'Iwan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:01)

Re: I agree Dean by 'chriskasch' (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:41)

Re: I agree Chris by 'John' (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:52)

Re: I agree Chris by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:01)

Re: I agree Chris by 'jkhintrepid77' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:39)

TKM class sustainability by 'NickyW' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:20)

Re: TKM class sustainability by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:26)

Re: TKM class sustainability by 'Underdog25' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:41)

Do nothing ? by 'DavyBoy' (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:00)

Re: Do nothing ? by 'NickyW' (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:25)

Re: TKM class sustainability by 'NickyW' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:47)

Re: TKM class sustainability by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)

Re: I agree Dean by 'Andrewrr' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:35)

Re: I agree Dean by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:38)

Also Andrewrr by 'Iwan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)

Re: I agree Dean by 'stemorton46' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)

Re: I agree Dean by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:56)

Re: I agree Dean by 'stemorton46' (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:03)

Re: I agree Dean by 'John' (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:29)

A lot of nonsense! by 'devilwoman25' (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)

Re: A lot of nonsense! by 'John' (19 Aug 2009 @ 18:08)

Re: A lot of nonsense! by 'devilwoman25' (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:10)

Re: A lot of nonsense! by 'KevinW' (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:27)

@Gem by 'DavyBoy' << You are here!

Re: @Gem by 'devilwoman25' (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:49)

Re: @Gem by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:03)

Re: @Gem by 'davidmc' (20 Aug 2009 @ 0:33)

Re: Ride Height? by 'dth07' (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:30)

Re: Ride Height? by 'deangwigan' (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:39)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links