Steveo is trying to tell you that the MAX height of the power curve is NOT the most important thing. Which engine would YOU prefer:-
1) One which produces 3bhp all the way THOUGH the range but then LEAPS to 29.7bhp at excatly 12,000 rpm but dropping bak to 3bhp after 12,500
or
2) One which poduced a FAT 29bhp from 8,000 rpm all the eway through to 16,000rpm?
If we said that 29.7bhp was EXCELLENT in response to your question.... we'd be telling you the wrong answer if your engine was like my first example.
Secondly, the BHP recorded on your dyno was produced in air temp X, humidity Y and air pressure Z. What happens when the wether conditions change?
Thirdly, it was also produced on Mr Blogg's dyno. My Dyno may WELL be calibrated differently and ALL the engines on my dyno might show as much as 1bhp MORE simply because I didn't get it calibrated by identically to your current one. How do we KNOW how 'your' dyno was calibrated?
The correct answer is..... you should ONLY use a dyno to compare changes, done on the same day, same conditions, same dyno, same operator. Trying to compare your engine on Dyno X with my engine on Dyno Y on a different day is simply a waste of time.
Ian
|
|