Hi John....
Again, my long history informs me on this matter.
Wheh I learned to choke (around the time of the invasion by the Normans...), we had Rotary Valve engines. The carb was short and directly above the chain. In those days, Chain Guards were NOT compulsory. It was also the habit of the more stupid amongst us to choke with the Palm-of-the-hand and not the closed-fingers as it made a better 'seal'. That allowed the fingers to be curved UNDER the Tillotson during choking and even while 'resting' the hand on the carb in anticipation of 'choking'.
Those of my age will KNOW how dangerouis that was as the length of the curved fingers was the same as the distance between the mouth of the carb and the chain.....
If you place your hand near a carb that is sucking HUGE quantities of Air, you hand BANGS into the carb as the 'seal' is formed.
.....Now think about a set of fingers being 'sucked' towards the rapidly rotating junction between the chain and the drive sprocket.......
.....I was at Rye House one day when 'Mr Black' (that dates me!) collected a mangled glove from the main straight that still contained 2 fingers..... where someone had done E*X*A*C*T*L*Y that!
*******
It's never been my experince that an engine seizes at the START of the overrun process as there SHOULD be plenty of oil still remaining on the surfaces for the 1/2 second between closing the throttle and applying the choke-hand. There's no extra heat being generated and the slow-jet, when correctly set, still SHOULD BE delivering fuel at over-run. In truth, on a TKM..... the VAST majority of the fuel is being delivered by the slow-jet which is BEHIND the butterfly in any case and is thus delivering almost a FULL quantity of fuel which almost ZERO combustion is occuring through lack or air.
So.... I take your point but still defend my chosen sequence of actions.... even though it's not quite so critical today as it was in my youth.
Ian
|
|