UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




Re: Ok, David, now explain it!
Posted by 'davidmc' on 18 Feb 2010 @ 08:59


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
davidmc
Joined: April 2003
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]
Remember, I'm talking about when the kart is steered. It's much easier to look at than explain, but I'll try. For the sake of simplicity we'll say KPI is the same as caster.

At 0deg caster, the wheel is steered on an arc parallel with the ground. As the kart is steered the outside wheel increases wheelbase and the inside wheel decreases wheelbase. Camber does not change. The steered angle of the wheels follows the steered angle of the steering wheel.

At 90deg caster, the wheel is steered on an arc perpendicular to the ground. As the kart is steered, wheelbaase remains the same. The outside wheel goes to more negative camber and the inside wheel goes to more positive camber. The steered angle of the wheels stays at 0.

Those are the two extremes. From that, you should be able to visualise what's happening at lower caster angles.

Message Thread:

positive or negative camber for wet?  by '1509'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 9:36)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'GillardKid'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 11:03)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by '1509'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 12:46)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'Mikekart95'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 13:16)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'stupott'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 14:26)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'NikG'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 15:56)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'itpro'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 16:10)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'NikG'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 16:22)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'itpro'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 17:41)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'NikG'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 19:31)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'davidmc'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 20:05)
Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'itpro'   (18 Feb 2010 @ 1:28)
Re: Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'davidmc'  << You are here!
Re: Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'NikG'   (18 Feb 2010 @ 9:39)
Re: Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'itpro'   (18 Feb 2010 @ 11:05)
Re: Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'stephenc47'   (18 Feb 2010 @ 19:44)
Re: Ok, David, now explain it!  by 'NikG'   (19 Feb 2010 @ 11:04)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by '1509'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 16:10)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'mike2903'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 20:27)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 21:53)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by 'dave56'   (17 Feb 2010 @ 22:04)
Re: positive or negative camber for wet?  by '1509'   (18 Feb 2010 @ 9:11)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Ok, David, now explain it!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk