UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




Re: I agree Dean
Posted by 'deangwigan' on 19 Aug 2009 @ 15:56


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
deangwigan
Joined: February 2004
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]
The idea of new axles is so expensive for anyone wanting to change a current chassis across, new bearing cassettes, bearings, carriers for brake and sprocket, hubs, cutting down of axles as they would probabley be too long to work, then the axle itself, which are far more expensive than a 30mm version. Then the added cost of possibly having a chassis modded to take a 50mm axle, the tony tkms wont take a 50mm I dont think so they wouldnt have the option where as the jkh could just drop one in without the need for modification. Allowing new axles would also then allow rear ride height adjustment and I dont think many would understand this initially and then the added worry that teams with money could have any old custom cassettes made to varying heights and specifications to allow for smalled changes at the rear end. BAD BAD BAD, and expensive!

Message Thread:

2010TKM Rules  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:22)
Re: 2010TKM Rules  by 'MattScott'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:35)
just another money making scheme ?  by 'winger93'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:40)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:48)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:02)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:11)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:16)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'NickyW'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:12)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'Graham S'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:17)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:19)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'John'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:27)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:34)
eh? :s (nt)  by 'blobslosak'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 17:17)
Re: eh? :s (nt)  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 22:27)
Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:59)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:13)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'KMS'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:26)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:57)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:10)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'richardmcculloch69'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 21:21)
TKM needs to be opened up  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:04)
100cc is allowed  by 'MattScott'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:10)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'Darlo'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:04)
I agree Dean  by 'Iwan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:01)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'chriskasch'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:41)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:52)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:01)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'jkhintrepid77'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:39)
TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:20)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:26)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'Underdog25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:41)
Do nothing ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:00)
Re: Do nothing ?  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:25)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:47)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'Andrewrr'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:35)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:38)
Also Andrewrr  by 'Iwan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'  << You are here!
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:03)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:29)
A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 18:08)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:10)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'KevinW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:27)
@Gem  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:06)
Re: @Gem  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:49)
Re: @Gem  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:03)
Re: @Gem  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 0:33)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'dth07'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:30)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:39)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: I agree Dean"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk