UK Karting - Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting) : Re: Control fuel

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)

Re: Control fuel
Posted by 'raceinstructor' on 21 Sep 2008 @ 08:00

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

raceinstructorJoined: August 2007
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]

That's a fair point bt3962, but if you left the fuel reg open to MSA regs and pump fuel you no longer require the specialist transport, storage and disposal licence that you listed. The only thing you need is the test equipment and technicians of which there must be a number around the country negating the requirement to travel from Dorset, however a designated series fuel scruitineer would be the way to go.
The cost involved in the fuel testing officials could be built in to the entry fee as are the other officials.
This route would in no way detract from the competitive racing and would be less of a pain for the teams.
My apologies to the employees of ATOL & SUNICO fuels as you need to earn a living but the current control fuel system is no more fair than an open pump fuel reg with the threat of fuel sampling and unreasonably expensive.

Message Thread:

Atol Fuel by 'NJB' (19 Sep 2008 @ 19:45)

Re: Atol Fuel by 'richydehav' (19 Sep 2008 @ 20:09)

Control fuel by 'DavyBoy' (19 Sep 2008 @ 20:47)

Re: Control fuel by 'RoadRat' (19 Sep 2008 @ 21:14)

Re: Control fuel by 'Tmoon' (20 Sep 2008 @ 9:41)

Re: Control fuel by 'alanrr' (20 Sep 2008 @ 21:50)

Re: Control fuel by 'bt3962' (21 Sep 2008 @ 5:54)

Re: Control fuel by 'raceinstructor' << You are here!

Re: Control fuel by 'Roblin' (21 Sep 2008 @ 9:04)

Re: Control fuel by 'DavyBoy' (21 Sep 2008 @ 11:21)

It's consistent! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:37)

Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:31)

ps forgot to tell you by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:35)

Re: ps forgot to tell you by 'richydehav' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:04)

Not really! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:43)

Re: Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'SSR' (22 Sep 2008 @ 17:30)

You seriously suggesting that Atol fill ALL...... by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 23:10)

Re: Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'bluetoo' (25 Sep 2008 @ 16:30)

Netto doesn't do fuel in Wimbourne! by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 11:49)

It's just you! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 14:16)

My understanding is that there is a....... by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:26)

Re: Fuel contracts by 'Graham S' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:11)

I keep forgetting! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:40)

Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 13:26)

Re: Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 16:40)

Re: Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 18:34)

We didn't have timing systems back when....... by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 19:10)

Forget additives for the moment. by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 19:28)

I haven't entered the other debate on...... by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 11:51)

There must be impartial evidence though... by 'DavyBoy' (24 Sep 2008 @ 13:46)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'RoadRat' (24 Sep 2008 @ 15:10)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 15:37)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'davidmc' (24 Sep 2008 @ 16:06)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 16:16)

Re: S1 entrants have to use Atol. by 'richydehav' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:07)

re: njb ???????? by 'John' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:39)

re: njb ???????? by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:44)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'davidmc' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:18)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:15)

I think that's a fair statement! by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:28)

Re: I think that's a fair statement! by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:41)

Not sure how quality of fuel can be tested on a... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 9:53)

Re: Not sure how quality of fuel can be tested on by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 11:57)

Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 13:55)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 16:55)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'broke' (25 Sep 2008 @ 17:30)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'richydehav' (25 Sep 2008 @ 18:16)

Some people don't agree with Neville! by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 19:27)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'bluetoo' (25 Sep 2008 @ 21:59)

But I suspect power output isn't how fuel Co's... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 19:25)

Re: But I suspect power output isn't how fuel Co's by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 20:48)

But as we both know, dyno testing is only an..... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 22:19)

Re: But as we both know, dyno testing is only an.. by 'davidmc' (26 Sep 2008 @ 0:41)

If Atol's the solution... what was the problem ? by 'DavyBoy' (26 Sep 2008 @ 20:18)

Impartial testing? by 'SteveC' (26 Sep 2008 @ 21:53)

Re: Impartial testing? by 'RoadRat' (27 Sep 2008 @ 8:25)

Impartial testing by 'DavyBoy' (28 Sep 2008 @ 9:04)

You still have a vested interest! by 'SteveC' (28 Sep 2008 @ 12:07)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:26)

To be fair back when we did it no! by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:25)

Tuners recommendations by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:21)

John has some fuel to test! by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 10:46)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links