
bhp or torque by 'KJM' (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:31)
 Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)
  Re: bhp or torque by 'PaulMRotax' (17 Aug 2009 @ 18:30)
   Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)
   Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)
    Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:22)
     Re: bhp or torque by 'KJM' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:38)
     Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (17 Aug 2009 @ 22:44)
      Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 0:14)
       Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 9:49)
        Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:05)
         Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:51)
          Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:10)
           Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:43)
            Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:41)
             Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)
              No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Chads' << You are here!
               Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'QuickOldTimer' (19 Aug 2009 @ 1:11)
                Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 8:36)
                 Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'QuickOldTimer' (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:31)
                  Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:27)
                   Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Hi99' (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:15)
                    Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'TanglerTKM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:48)
                     contd by 'TanglerTKM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:51)
                      Re: contd by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)
                    Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:40)
                     Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Hi99' (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:13)
                      Davidmc is this correct? by 'Hufggfg' (21 Aug 2009 @ 8:33)
                       Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'davidmc' (21 Aug 2009 @ 9:57)
                        Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'Hufggfg' (21 Aug 2009 @ 12:02)
                         Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'davidmc' (21 Aug 2009 @ 13:07)
 KJM, your best means of altering .. by 'Chads' (18 Aug 2009 @ 2:13)
  Re: KJM, your best means of altering .. by 'KJM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 9:39)
   David, that doesn't make sense by 'Booney' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:19)
    Re: David, that doesn't make sense by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:53)
    Maximum accel is at max torque by 'PhilOwen' (20 Aug 2009 @ 17:28)
     Re: Maximum accel is at max torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:59)
      Re: QOT by 'John' (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:18)
       Re: QOT by 'QuickOldTimer' (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:26)
        Re: QOT by 'John' (20 Aug 2009 @ 23:51)
|