"not the fault of the driver defending (unless the driver defending is weaving or braking testing). There is surely no other way of defending? If you're off the normal racing line then you must have at some point weaved?
I can think of no other form of racing in sport, such as horse racing, athletics, cycling, etc; where officialdom doesn't rigorously enforce the rules on blocking or holding up other competitors. I simply cannot understand the mentality of a driver who derives satisfaction or sense of achievement, from finishing in front of a faster driver having baulked him! How can you get no satisfaction from driving on the limit and setting a great lap time?
I quote Graham Hill (twice world motor racing champion, 16 times Grand Prix winner) in his tribute to Jim Clark:
"In the cockpit, the excitement of racing lies in controlling the car within very fine limits. Motor racing is really a great balancing act, having the car broken away and drifting, doing exactly as you want it to and getting round the corners as quickly as possible, knowing that you've done this and hoping that you've done it better than any other driver. You aim at perfection, without ever actually achieving it. But every so often you can say, "Thats it. Now beat that you ba***rds." This is the essence of motor racing. In this Jimmy was unsurpassed...."
|
|