Lovely. Just when you think hardly anyone reads this stuff anymore, some-one is motivated enough to boldly break cover (if that's possible while remaining studiously anonymous) to express their displeasure - if not actually to question what I've said or, heaven forbid, to tell me how wrong I am. Nor does he seem to have a problem with the more numerous points raised by another here.
Richy:
It's all here: http://www.karting1.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18361&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=84b5e866a85f4a444609e3861bb6e15d
No, it's not the ABkC that protects the market for particular distributors. That would be the MSA. But the ABkC could take an interest on behalf of the product-buying karting community, or not? X30 is just one example, of course; albeit a particularly glaring one.
It is the ABkC, however, that allocates income from tyre contracts in the way it does. Are you happy with that? Mr Anon clearly is.
Getting back to Mr Anon: fret not, few will read this and even fewer will care. And I'm sure 'they' know "how it is".
|
|