- “This is the problem for the MSA, their employees know that some of the decisions are not in the best interest of karting but having agreed to take the advice of the committees of 'expert' opinion from outside of the MSA they are bound to that advice.”
You are presumably referring to the ABkC. Some think the MSA is the ‘baddie’; some think it’s the ABkC. Whatever the reality is, having two ‘governing’ bodies is totally pointless, profoundly confusing and unnecessarily doubles the cost.
Otherwise I read in your post agreement that the 'system' is rotten; that MSA karting is more like an assembly of personal fiefdoms.
Ergo, one body has to go, the other needs to reform dramatically.
- “…and for many people the attraction of 'independent' karting is the lower cost, gained at the expense of being subjected to the whim of officials without recourse to a higher authority.”
IKR doesn’t need a “higher authority” because participants don’t take themselves so seriously and there is a culture of no-contact driving, which the organisers/operators have a keen interest in enforcing should the need ever arise. Nothing wrong with that in my view.
|
|