This is becoming a religion now, there is so much to comment on!
As NickyW said, sound quality was appalling at the start of the programme. Compare the interview sound to the coms sound and it sounds as tho the commentary was being done underwater. Picture quality has massively improved over the first 2 programmes but the colours between the 4?? cameras were all different. I thought they were the same cameras? The Camera positioning has taken a leap backwards since PFi, had no idea the shape of the track or the pattern of edit. Not again helped by an irregular pattern of editing. It seemed as the race edit was grabbing any usable shot rather than following the races. The On board Picture was awesome, better than the track cams, but the phasing and warping looked very odd. Graphics are still to small at the end of the programme to you cant read the writing. Sams interview question were good, but i felt the first one went on far to long. As did the graphics and so we probably missed out on loads of racing i guess.
All in All, many things we wrote about still have not been addressed, probably because as Alan admitted, he couldnt be bothered to read the constructive criticism written after the last round...... ALAN the reason my 'essay' was so long was because the programme has so many errors!?! Lets just hope they are sorted by the end of the season, if he lasts that long.... 3 strikes and out IMO.
James
|
|