UK Karting

Notice Board (General Karting)




Re: itpro
Posted by 'itpro' on 24 Nov 2008 @ 16:54


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
NJB

I LOVE this approach. First, you try to chellenge the 'point' by saying 'well.... YOU do it!". When I knock THAT argument down, you now suggest that it can't be done......

I see, so, NOT being able to make it 100% effective means that we shouldn't BOTHER with it!

Well, about 10 second's worth of thought would make you wonder about your views on:-

1) Ramming ('firing' in 'new-speak')
2) Illegal Engines
3) Fuel additives
4) Tyre softeners
5) Tyre heating
...etc.

....and on a wider scale....

6) Heroin and Cocaine

Why?

Well, I suspect that we ALSO have not managed to stamp any of THOSE out.... should we use the SAME logic as you are suggesting we use about Kerbs?

Using heat-guns to ... ahem..... 'clean' tyres was ALSO universal and against the rules, has THAT stopped the MSA deciding that practice should be STOPPED, too? In what WAY would that be different for 'kerbing'?

In reality, all I am asking is for the tracks to be REALISTIC about it: all they HAVE to do is to mark the edge of the track (white line) BEHIND the Kerb! For those of you who ARE too mindless to see the damage that kerbing DOES to your karts, then you'd STILL be able to hit as many kerbs as you LIKED...... but you would NOT be cheating to do so! Which you ALL are, today!

Basically, none of you have the right to complain about the MORAL side of 'cheating' while you CONTINUE to PROMOTE cheating in THIS way!

Ian

Message Thread:

Spot on Itpro.  by 'raceinstructor'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 8:09)
This isn't new.  by 'DavyBoy'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 8:48)
not every circuit  by 'andrewf'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 9:46)
Re: not every circuit  by 'SimonS'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 21:46)
Re: not every circuit  by 'andrewf'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:12)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 22:27)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 23:06)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 0:08)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 0:16)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'raceinstructor'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:18)
Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:06)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:23)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 19:07)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 19:51)
Tripe  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:00)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:03)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:27)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 10:19)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:51)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:00)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:18)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:15)
So this is the rule that can't be relaxed!  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)
Re: So this is the rule that can't be relaxed!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:04)
And......  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:13)
4 ie whole of the kart!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:13)
Ahhhh haaa!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)
I don't know if I agree or disagree with.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:20)
Re: I don't know if I agree or disagree with......  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:34)
I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:39)
Re: I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:52)
Re: I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)
You can't have a rule that covers all.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:44)
Re: You can't have a rule that covers all.......  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:01)
Luckily every CoC in the Country is using........  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:39)
That's TRIPE Steve!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:08)
Re: That's TRIPE Steve!  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:25)
Historic, exactly!  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:43)
I knew you'd missed the point!  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:35)
Re: I knew you'd missed the point!  by 'itpro'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 16:42)
Not same size, but same shape!  by 'SteveC'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 10:57)
Wrong........... yet AGAIN, Steve!  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:12)
Play on words Ian!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:33)
I would be enforcing them as per MSA regs!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'SimonS'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:29)
When has the 'rule' ever been enforced  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 11:48)
Re: When has the 'rule' ever been enforced  by 'RobWallace'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 13:35)
Lucky it's only a disc protector.  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 13:46)
HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:02)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:32)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:02)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:04)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:09)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'alanrr'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:07)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:20)
Tony hasn't CoC'd at Kim for over.....  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:46)
Re: Tony hasn't CoC'd at Kim for over.....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:45)
I don't need to re write it,........  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:17)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:01)
Your inconsistencies are STUNNING!  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:06)
You saying Tony Temple........  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
ps As Junior British Team Manager Tony.....  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:42)
Re: ps As Junior British Team Manager Tony.....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:52)
Rules with discretion are because no two.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:23)
RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 17:58)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:25)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:13)
Of course 'Pierre' would get away with it!!  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 22:47)
Re: Of course 'Pierre' would get away with it!!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 2:04)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:07)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:18)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 21:14)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 21:29)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'davidmc'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 9:36)
DavidMc  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:01)
Re: DavidMc  by 'davidmc'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Re: DavidMc  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:30)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 2:17)
itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 8:39)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:09)
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:39)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:57)
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)
Re: itpro  by 'Florent'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:51)
How unusual!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:01)
Re: How unusual!  by 'Florent'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:13)
Re: How unusual!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:52)
You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:25)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 12:11)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:25)
Behave Ian, Florent is a great guy!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:52)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:28)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)
cont..  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:34)
Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:50)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:19)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:25)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:37)
English culture lessons for free!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)
Re: Is.....  by 'Aztech'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 22:30)
It's exciting, it's waht it must have been like...  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)
Re: Thats quite funy Steve...  by 'Aztech'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 10:03)
I could do it in a Jonathan Woss accent, but......  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 10:47)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:26)
Re: lol  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 18:42)
Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 19:36)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'broke'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 19:57)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:10)
Matt  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:21)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:41)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:55)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 21:42)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 22:38)
Some answers to this.  by 'DavyBoy'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 9:20)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'adey8ball'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 9:59)
re the Clay chicane  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)
Matt  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:35)
Dan, Dave, RceInstr, etc..  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:46)
Re: itpro  by 'MattBell'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:01)
Re: Mat  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:13)
Matt + Re: Dan, Dave, RceInstr, etc..  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:14)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: itpro"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk